Data Governance Guidance by Gwen ThomasGuidance by Gwen
Funding for Data Stewardship / Data Quality /
Issue Analysis

Previous
Next

Most organizations with formal Data Governance efforts give a significant level of attention to ongoing Data Stewardship efforts, resolving issues that arise as natural conflicts between stakeholders are uncovered, and/or Data Quality efforts.

Typically, organizations choose one of five models for funding such efforts.
  • Program funding (similar to funding a PMO)
  • Using a project's budget to fund these efforts
  • Listing these activities as line items in other projects' or departments' budgets
  • Charge-backs to stakeholder groups
  • No funding - treating these efforts as "crack-filler" activities
It should be noted that the last option - treating these efforts as activities to be completed "as time permits" - is rarely judged as satisfactory to Data Stakeholders. On the other hand, sometimes it is the only option available during the period between deciding to start these activities and the organization's next formal funding cycle.
Previous
Next


Copyright 2004-2008 The Data Governance Institute, LLC. All Rights Reserved

The site is brought to you in partnership with the
Business Intelligence Network


DGI Header
GwenThomas
Data Governance.com
DataGovernance.com is an affiliate of BeyeNETWORK
>
1. Funding Data Governance

2. Funding for Ongoing Data Governance

3. Funding for Data Stewardship / Data Quality / Issue Analysis

4. Funding Projects And Efforts That Result From Governance-Led Issue Analysis

5. A Legacy Approach:
Portfolio Management


6. A New Model: Combining Portfolio Management and Data Governance Recommendations